Hi,
I'm making the decision to not backup file groups and only backup databases (with backkup exec.
I don't see any reason I would have to resore individual file groups.
Does anyone know why I should backup file groups or in what situation I would need to restore individual file groups?Dont know your situation. If a user drops a table(which
typically the cant) you could restore it by itself if its
in its own filegroup.
>--Original Message--
>Hi,
>I'm making the decision to not backup file groups and
only backup databases (with backkup exec.)
>I don't see any reason I would have to resore individual
file groups.
>Does anyone know why I should backup file groups or in
what situation I would need to restore individual file
groups?
>.
>|||Chris,
I assume that you mean that the filegroup restore would help to restore only
that table to an earlier point in time? That is not possible as when you
restore a filegroup, you also have to apply all subsequent transaction log
backups.
However, I should hasten to add, in SQL2K, you can do a PARTIAL restore into
a new database and move that table to the production database. There are
restriction, however, like the primary filegroup has top be part of the
backup.
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
Archive at:
http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&as_ugroup=microsoft.public.sqlserver
"chris" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:b15301c3ecc9$e7651950$a101280a@.phx.gbl...
> Dont know your situation. If a user drops a table(which
> typically the cant) you could restore it by itself if its
> in its own filegroup.
>
> >--Original Message--
> >Hi,
> >I'm making the decision to not backup file groups and
> only backup databases (with backkup exec.)
> >I don't see any reason I would have to resore individual
> file groups.
> >Does anyone know why I should backup file groups or in
> what situation I would need to restore individual file
> groups?
> >.
> >|||Mannie,
The way I look at filegroup backup and restore is that I prefer to avoid it
if I can. If I have a database too large to handle with "regular" backup
methods, then I consider it. Just the fact that your database is toast if
you are missing one log backup taken after the filegroup you have restore
feel a bit scary to me.
I prefer to keep things as simple as possible. You can still use filegroups
and even do filegroup restore from a full backup (possibly using the PARTIAL
option of applicable).
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
Archive at:
http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&as_ugroup=microsoft.public.sqlserver
"mannie" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:53DEF63A-8C4A-45A9-A48A-88A19688217D@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I'm making the decision to not backup file groups and only backup
databases (with backkup exec.)
> I don't see any reason I would have to resore individual file groups.
> Does anyone know why I should backup file groups or in what situation I
would need to restore individual file groups?
Showing posts with label backkup. Show all posts
Showing posts with label backkup. Show all posts
Friday, March 9, 2012
Reasons to restore individual file groups.
Hi,
I'm making the decision to not backup file groups and only backup databases
(with backkup exec.)
I don't see any reason I would have to resore individual file groups.
Does anyone know why I should backup file groups or in what situation I woul
d need to restore individual file groups?Mannie,
The way I look at filegroup backup and restore is that I prefer to avoid it
if I can. If I have a database too large to handle with "regular" backup
methods, then I consider it. Just the fact that your database is toast if
you are missing one log backup taken after the filegroup you have restore
feel a bit scary to me.
I prefer to keep things as simple as possible. You can still use filegroups
and even do filegroup restore from a full backup (possibly using the PARTIAL
option of applicable).
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
Archive at:
http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=...ublic.sqlserver
"mannie" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:53DEF63A-8C4A-45A9-A48A-88A19688217D@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I'm making the decision to not backup file groups and only backup
databases (with backkup exec.)
> I don't see any reason I would have to resore individual file groups.
> Does anyone know why I should backup file groups or in what situation I
would need to restore individual file groups?
I'm making the decision to not backup file groups and only backup databases
(with backkup exec.)
I don't see any reason I would have to resore individual file groups.
Does anyone know why I should backup file groups or in what situation I woul
d need to restore individual file groups?Mannie,
The way I look at filegroup backup and restore is that I prefer to avoid it
if I can. If I have a database too large to handle with "regular" backup
methods, then I consider it. Just the fact that your database is toast if
you are missing one log backup taken after the filegroup you have restore
feel a bit scary to me.
I prefer to keep things as simple as possible. You can still use filegroups
and even do filegroup restore from a full backup (possibly using the PARTIAL
option of applicable).
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
Archive at:
http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=...ublic.sqlserver
"mannie" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:53DEF63A-8C4A-45A9-A48A-88A19688217D@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I'm making the decision to not backup file groups and only backup
databases (with backkup exec.)
> I don't see any reason I would have to resore individual file groups.
> Does anyone know why I should backup file groups or in what situation I
would need to restore individual file groups?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)